(You know that there might be a good goblin but nah). Reg is chaotic evil clearly by your logic he deserves to be killed when you first rescue him along with octavia because she's been corrupted by evil. Originally posted by Robineus:Yes ok I get it, you are incapable of seeing past the cardboard cut out of alignments, it is a simplistic hint and in no way captures the complexity of interesting characters.

Which resulted in some amusing 'cavalry of kobolds arrives to save the day'-kind of situations in the pnp.I wish that had happened in this adaptation. As soon as the chief hears about the trouble with Pitax, he organizes a whole army of kobolds and heads to the front-lines to support the kingdom in the war. You will follow the laws of the kingdom to the letter, and will be judged harshly if you break them.'īy the way, different tribe of kobolds, but if the players helped the Sootscales in the pnp version. You will destroy altars to your old deity, and convert to the worship of Apsu. Being a ruler, the LG decision could've been something more interesting, such as: 'You're part of my barony now.

Which makes the 'kill them all'-reaction a missed opportunity. Because following the hierarchy is hard-wired for them. Even if raised from an egg in a chaotic community, they'll have a slant towards lawful. Don't forget that lawful/chaotic-axis is as powerful as good/evil in this setting. Originally posted by GrandMajora:The Kobolds were following Tartuk, not Tartuk's ideals. Like really? You just gonna put in all the dirty bag kill all the people stuff? Great we have a choatic stupid dev. I do dislike that there are so many choatic evil choices over any other alignment. If there is no evil at least pick lawful, if there is no lawful pick neutral evil. If there is no lawful, pick nuetral good, if there is no good choose lawful nuetral. As long as you have one of the two alignment options you're good. What I've found works, but I dislike doing is this. I find that the moral choice that are available seem to be so limited that it doesn't matter what you pick in the end. Lucky they just put in the attonement scrolls, cause now it doesn't matter how you act in the game you can just buy your way out of it. Since we as players don't have th choice in advance to know that there are very few LG/LE moral choices it's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ that the devs did something like this. Making a choice to pick a class with a strict alignment in a game, but the devs not giving enough options to stay within that restriction is by definition insanity. Hell, my LN Inquisitor of Abadar has moved to LG over the course of the game, and I'm sticking to that pretty well so far. Seriously, just pick LN over NG from time to time and its easy to stay LG. If every option just had an LG choice to it, it wouldn't be a cost anymore. You picked a class that had a distinct requirement to stick with a certain alignment, even if it might cost you having to do something you don't want to do, and then chose to not do that when given the option. Lack of choices forcing you into actions you don't want to take. Originally posted by dusteki:This is a severe issue with Paladins and other alignment affected classes.

Moral instanity pathfinder